User talk:IMC.esq

Welcome!

Hello, IMC.esq, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Anna Lincoln (talk) 08:55, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was interested to see

your recent posting at Talk:Vanna Bonta. Does that mean we get the article back, or was it just presenting facts and opinions ? Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 15:24, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

we should get it back

The article on Vanna Bonta is verifiable facts. The reasons DDG stated for deleting it is opinions and rehashed hostile nonsense posted by vandals. But the Vanna Bonta bio article is facts, only facts. We should get it back. The reason given for deletion is hostile opinions, no facts. Talk:Vanna Bonta IMC.esq (talk) IMC.esq (talk) 15:58, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: DDG is parroting denigrating opinions vandals chattered in the 2007 Request for Deletion. (sci fi amateur writers with personal problems that ganged up to delete the article in 2007 and other documented vandalism slander nonsense). It was reviewed and identified as vandalism. Talk:Vanna Bonta

You cannot have a talk page where there is no article. That is not the way that Wikipedia works. The article was correctly deleted as per the deletion policy. If you have new data that would support an undeletion then the place to raise that is Wikipedia:Deletion review. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 16:46, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]